The MegaFurry FAQ|
Published Version 1.0
Copyright 1994-2003, Phillip Pollard
$Revision: 1.3 $ $Date: 2003/09/19 03:53:32 $
|1.1||WHAT IS MACROPHILIA?|
|1.2||WHAT ABOUT MICROPHILIA?|
|1.3||BUT ISN'T THAT ALSO MACROPHILIA?|
|1.4||JUST WHERE DOES BIG BECOME MACRO?|
|2.1||WHAT IS THE SQUARE-CUBE LAW?|
|2.||THEN DOESN'T THIS EVENTUALLY GET UNREALISTIC?|
|3.2.3||Consumption of others (Voreaphilia)|
|3.3.1||Sexual Exaggeration Hypertorphilia?)|
|3.3.3||Consumption of food (Lipophilia?)|
1 Basic Questions
1.1 WHAT IS MACROPHILIA?
macro-: 1. being large 2. of [...] a large scale
phile: having a fondness or affinity for
Merriam-Webster, 10th Ed
To put it simply, a Macrophile is a person who has interest or affinity
for large scale or size.
To the best of public knowledge, the term was first used in a brief
scientific paper The work, authored under the pseudonym of Samuel Ramses,
M.D., Ph.D., was titled "Introduction to Macrophilia." (For reference it
is reproduced in the Appendix)
1.2 WHAT ABOUT MICROPHILIA?
Microphilia is the reverse of Macrophilia. It is a strong interes in
the small or miniaturized.
1.3 BUT ISN'T THAT ALSO MACROPHILIA?
Slight confusion arises occasionally. Since any giant inherently dwarfs
his or her partner, the two fields can be quite related. A very tiny
person would see a world of giants. A giant ould see a world of tiny
people. And they both like it.
Often the term 'Macrophile' is used as a catchall phrase for
Macrophiles and Microphiles. As quoted by Dr. Ramses, in this position the
term Macrophile can be applied to "a person who experienced a exual
response to situations involving creatures of greatly differing size."
So basically, a Microphile desires to be the smaller person, a
Macrophile desires to be the larger person, and both are subsets of the
whole thing that's called Macrophilia.
1.4 JUST WHERE DOES BIG BECOME MACRO?
One of the most difficult lines of definition of Macrophilia is what
necessarily compromises a giant or a dwarf.
The human frame at its extremes can be over a 2:1 size difference. It
is not uncommon for dwarves near 3 fet and persons more than 6.
While there is almost an inherent selfish desire for power and size,
the question begs if the addition of only a few inches or percent in size
is actually Macrophilia or not.
Often debated, the general consensus among persos in the macrophile
community is that the basic ratio of 2:1 is about where the dividing line
where normal desires become macrophilic or microphilic.
2 The Mathematics
2.1 WHAT IS THE SQUARE-CUBE LAW?
The square-cube law, also referred to as spacial math is the basis for
measuring and predicting proportional growth statistics.
Essentially as an object increases in height by x, it's surface areas
increase by x squared, it's volume increases by x cubed. As an object gets
bigger it gets much heavier in proortion.
The base example for principle is that if something became twice as
big, it would become 8 times as heavy.
The problem is that as a person got bigger their weight would steadily
outstrip their ability to handle it. They would become unable to hld
themselves up, and eventually their bones could not support them.
A fine example is the flamingo bird. If such an animal were suddenly
grown to the size of an elephant, its supple legs would only be the size
of a 2x4 or so, and unable to hold an elephnt's weight.
2.2 THEN DOESN'T THIS EVENTUALLY GET UNREALISTIC?
Yes it does. Many stories, sketches, and fantasies all blatantly
violate the ramifications of the square-cube law and could never
The sad news for most macrophiles is that the larges a bipedal creature
could probably be and be mobile would be at about 40 feet or so. Even to
attain that height, massive non-proportional changes would be
A fine example is the T. Rex. Each of it's lower legs are nearly equal
in weight as it'supper body. They need to be to support it's shear
Even with this apparent limit, fantasies will be what they shall. Just
remember that there's an awful lot of size below 40 feet.
3 Related Interests
Macrophilia tends to have a very boad cross-interest appeal. It is
tangential to other interests as well as directly encompassing others.
Different folks can be attracted to macrophilia for different reasons.
3.2 IMPLICIT INTERESTS
Implicit interests are interests that require or appear amost
exclusively in macrophilia.
Probably the strongest base interest in Macrophilia is the power. The
raw physical power of size is what most folks find to be the primary
influence. As such, it is the most popular interest to derive pleasure.
There seem to be two camps of power interests. The first is those who
utilize and display their power through violent acts, sexual and
non-sexual. The second camp is those who display power via the implication
of danger and violent acts.
Anther interest is in the process of growth. Transformation fetishes
are extremely common and can be sub sectioned into a plethora of
interests. Growth is one of these transformation interests and is directly
rated to macrophile.
Whereas all macrophiles ar not necessarily interested in growth, it's
almost impossible for a person interested in growth to not end up a giant.
As such, it's an implicit interest.
Growth is typically displayed in two major camps of interests. The
first area is that of proportionl growth. The other area, non-proportional
growth, is moist often paired with hypertorphilic (exaggerated sexual
3.2.3 CONSUMPTION OF OTHERS (VOREAPHILIA)
Voreaphilia involves consuming a person while they are alive. Thetwo
obvious spheres of interest are those who wished to be consumed, and those
who wish to consume others.
The act of consumption may or may not be painful. Some of the eaters
almost insist that their subjects feel no pain.
While under special fantasy bsed circumstances an eater can consume
another of equal size (and there is a small, dedicated camp for this), by
far most Voreaphilic acts occur with giants.
Confinement and death achieved through crushing is an interesting
fetish. It is one o a number of the number of fetishes involve folks
wishing for and achieving death as part of the highpoint of their
Death related fetishes are often mistaken as a sign of a sick mind.
However, otherwise very normal persons can enjoy such intersts and the
assumption is fairly baseless.
While it is possible to enjoy this fetish without the involvement of
giants, the shear menu of interesting situations and interactions with a
gigantic partner that can cause death via a crushing action or maneuvr
tends to cause almost all of these persons to be dedicated
3.3 TANGENTIAL INTERESTS
Tangential interests are fetishes that do not necessarily require
macrophilia to occur, and are often popular outside of macrophilia,
however they work welland often appear in macrophilic circles. Some would
say they are enhanced by macrophilia.
3.3.1 SEXUAL EXAGGERATION (HYPERTORPHILIA?)
Another very common theme in macrophilia is Hypertorphilia.
Hypertorphilia is an interest with exaggerated sexual charactristics.
Outside of Macrophilia, hypertorphilia is achieved by (sometimes rather
extreme) non-proportionality. Macrophilia, by it's very nature, provides
a giant scale of sexual organs and other related erotic zones are
comparatively enormous in size, fnction, and action.
This results in an interesting sub-group of Hypertorphalic persons who
desire their extreme size within a proportional frame. They have no choice
but to deal with the giants of macrophilia.
And for those who never have enough, the nn-proportional trend can be
continued to produce truly gigantic specimens of interest. (Insert Doug
Winger picture here)
The base interest of macrophile is a power based in physical size.
Often due to this physical interest, macrophiles end to also show a
parallel interest in physical prowess, sometimes to extreme levels.
Both Macrophilia and muscular interests are a desire for physical
power, they tend to appeal to the same audience a lot. Again, as with
other Tangential interests, theis a positively huge market of muscular
interests outside of the macrophile community.
Muscular is one of the grayest macrophile areas. Many folks who are
interested in muscle tend to desire a slight increase in overall size and
build, often narrowly touhing or sitting on the 2:1 line. Thus, like other
Tangential areas it is occasionally the entrance point for a person to
discover their own macrophilia.
3.3.3 CONSUMPTION OF FOOD (LIPOPHILIA?)
Aside from normal growth, consumption of extreme amounts of fod is one
of the methods to achieve a giant size.
The interest in food consumption as a fetish is again a broad market as
are most of the Tangential interests. There is a strong subgroup of folks
who achieve and maintain gigantic fantasy sizes by increasigly gigantic
amount of food and materials to eat.
Though this is a gray area, much like musculature interest, the folks
who have macrophilic interests tend to be markedly more noticeable from
those who do not. It's not hard to deem someone who is consumig half of a
city as a giant.
3.3.4 PAWS (PODOPHILIA)
Probably the largest and most well known of the Tangential interests is
that of the common foot fetishes. Macrophiles present lovely examples of
positively giant examples of feet that allow a range of iteractions that
is normally barred from most foot fetish fantasies.
As with many of the contact fetishes they can be mixed and matched. A
foot fetishist who also is interested in being crushed will find a good
home in Macrophilia.
3.3.5 PREGNANCY (GRAVIPHLIA?)
Probably the least known of the tangent fetishes, extreme size through
pregnancy is a small but dedicated fetish found in many communities. As
with the consumption fetish, it can be used to achieve gigantic size.
Again, rare, but there. (Stellos pi)
Last, but definitely not least, is the interest in inflation. The
inflation sphere of interest is fairly broad in application and
definition. The least of which is the persons who attain gigantic forms
Often used as agag in cartoons, the increase of size via air or liquid
inflation is a serious deal to its followers. All of it's associated
related interests of popping, or not popping, or rubber materials, etc may
or may not be included in the giants you find formed frm pumping
Appendix A: Introduction to Macrophilia
by Samuel Ramses, M.D., Ph.D.
The word macrophile is derived from the Latin roots macro, meaning
"large", and phile, meaning, loosely, "lover". It was initially coined to
refer toa person who experienced a sexual response to situations involving
creatures of greatly differing size. In such a situation, one of the
creatures must of necessity be a "giant" in relation to the other, and
thus macrophile was considered to be a suitably omprehensive term. In
recent years, however, the term has come to refer to a person who
specifically enjoys the appearance of giant creatures, whereas microphile
has been applied to those who prefer creatures who are tiny. For clarity,
the term macrophile will be used here in its original, all-inclusive
Macrophilia is a fairly widespread trait, and is found in individuals
of many different ethnic and social backgrounds. No common element has yet
been found that can point to an environmental cuse, although three
characteristics are repeatedly seen:
Macrophilia manifests itself in very early childhood. Children
with macrophilic tendencies commonly exhibit a sexual or pseudo-sexual
response to giants long before physical puberty.
Macrophila is almost always a guilty pleasure. This is perhaps
related to the previous observation, as sexuality in very young children
is looked down upon, and the associated repression and guilt carry over
into adulthood. Macrophiles are extremely shy about thei tendencies, even
among sympathetic peers, and to a greater degree than other fetishists. It
is felt that this is the singular reason that macrophilia has not been
more thoroughly reported in the literature of various cultures.
Macrophiles usually feel solated, and believe that few if any
others share their desires.
The specific stimuli which elicit a sexual response in a
macrophile, while varied, tend to fall into two broad categories, which
are not mutually exclusive. They are summarized here as dirctly sexual
situations and indirectly sexual or fixational situations.
Directly sexual stimuli are the more easily understood. These involve
situations in which sexual contact occurs between creatures (human or
otherwise) whose physical size differs by reater than (as an arbitrary
delimiter) a factor of two, and often much more. Such situations commonly
involve the following:
Full-body contact with the genitalia of a male giant, or full-body
insertion into the vagina of a female.
Oral contact, in wich the smaller party is licked or taken
entirely into the mouth of the giant (see vorarephilia, below)
Bathing in or inundation by the sexual fluids of a giant
Frotteurism, or masturbation by rubbing of the body against other
portions of the giant' person
Indirectly sexual or fixational situations involve other fetishes that
often go hand-in-hand with macrophilia. Interestingly, these "other"
preoccupations do not always manifest themselves in non-macrophilic
situations, but rather will only be oserved when a giant and/or a tiny
person are involved. They include:
Sadism/masochism: pleasure is achieved by being physically harmed
or even killed by a giant
Dominance/submission: pleasure is derived from being at the mercy
of a giant, or from beng in control of a tiny person
Vorarephilia: a fixation with eating or swallowing
Crush fixations: a sexual thrill is gained by the act of crushing
or of seeing a small creature crushed; a more specific subset is
macrophilic podophilia (foot fetishim), in which pleasure is obtained from
small creatures being stepped on
Destruction: pleasure is obtained from the act of demolishing
buildings and/or massive loss of life (often associated with displaced
Bestial fixations: the subject ofdesire is a giant animal, often
anthropomorphized (given human characteristics)
As previously stated, the macrophile will often find one or more of
these practices unappealing or even repugnant in "normal" situaions; yet,
when they are being perpetrated by or upon a giant, they suddenly become
attractive. Similarly, the distinction between heterosexuality and
homosexuality is sometimes blurred or reduced to zero, as staunchly
heterosexual macrophiles will often ind themselves attracted to the images
of giants or tiny persons of the same sex, and vice-versa.
The subject is a male Caucasian, age 30, from an upper-middle class
suburban background, and reportedly from a well-adjusted family. He is
hghly educated and has no criminal record. His sense of morals and of
civic duty are highly- developed, to the extent that he volunteers
frequently for local charitable and relief organizations. The subject
reports that since very early childhood he experieced a sexual response in
the form of genital erection to films in which giant monsters would
destroy cities. He further reports that the strongest response was
elicited by the explicit depiction of death by trampling. As an adult, his
fantasies continued n the destruction/sadism/crush-fixation fields, and
also included vorarephilia as well as directly sexual situations. Despite
what might be considered alarmingly antisocial macrophilic fixations, the
subject has experienced normal sexual relations in the ast and has shown
no signs of violent or unusually destructive behavior.
A simplistic view of macrophilia holds that persons who are of a
submissive sexual nature often prefer to view themselves in the role of
the tiny person interacting with a giant creture, whereas those of a
dominant sexual nature view themselves as a giant. Whereas this may indeed
be true in a certain number of cases, it is far from a complete picture. A
significant number of macrophiles exhibit the opposite behavior, while
others ar content with either role, regardless of their own sexual
leanings. This group seems to enjoy the situation itself, rather than the
specific role being played, and are thus equally excited by the view from
the top, from the bottom, or from that of the omnscient observer.
Any study of psychosexual phenomena should include mention of the
question of latency. There are subjects who claim to have developed
macrophilic tendencies after postpubescent exposure to it. It is a matter
of debate whether these indiiduals are "true" macrophiles who simply did
not recognize or were unwilling to acknowledge earlier tendencies, or are
simply expanding upon existing tendencies which become much more
pronounced when the sexual partner is gigantic. A hypothesis has been pt
forth that the question can by answered for purely fixational macrophiles
by examining whether a fetish existed before macrophilia was discovered
and whether it persists in the absence of a giant; while intuitive, this
hypothesis has yet to undergo any igorous testing. Thus, at this time, the
question of latent macrophilia remains the subject of debate.
In conclusion, it should be noted once more that macrophilia is far
from rare, as evidenced by the growing number of admitted macrophiles that
have coe forth in recent years. A suggestion that it is actually quite
common can be found in the popularity of cinematic films featuring giant
monsters, which draw in enormous crowds and cult followings in spite of
sometimes questionable quality. Perhaps, deep n the psyche of many of the
thousands of moviegoers, sits the child who wrestled with unfamiliar and
frightening sensations at the tale of Jack and the Beanstalk, and who now
laughs raucously - yet nervously - at the object of desire who rages
across the creen, leaving the viewer feeling aroused, nervous, and deeply,